Search Results

No michael we have to wait until November for the blood to start running in the streets. I just hope that the city drainage system can handle the increased flow that the anti's promised us.

Yay signed and all, but what is this "25th state" crap I keep reading? Aren't there like 42 states with open carry?

I imagine that first law you mentioned was challenged on the basis of property rights in that a business owner can ban whatever they wish on their premises. Open carry has no such complications. A business owner can still ban people from carrying openly just like thu can ban people from...

I believe that language was part of the bill that had open carry licenses being given out by NRA instructors.

Fallin said Saturday that she WILL sign 1733. why she didn't do it the moment it hit her desk I can't fathom, besides the possibilty that she wants to drum up the suspense.

Sb1733 is now on Fallin's desk

Sorry Glock guys, but we win. Posted this at m4carbine, but figured I'd post here too.

I'm with ya there, but idk if our legislature is mature enough to discuss constitutional carry. However, there is a bill in now that would allow anyone from the states that allow Constitutional carry to carry in oklahoma with just their state issued drivers license, if that passes, well have...

I know that's the problem. In all this stupid bickering it would have been easy for someone to reword that paragraph so that it didn't make carrying almost literally any object ever illegal. But no, they were busy with attempting to charge fetuses with manslaughter.

As much as I'm hoping open carry passes, I'm a hell of a lot more concerned about fixing this original part of the SDA in bold than about accidentally showing my concealed weapon; Literally anything in the world could be construed as "an offensive weapon". The way this is worded makes it...

If this turns out to be the case, I imagine this whole charade was to make sure the bill that passes had an "s" in front of the "b" and This whole thing is because the senate got butthurt over last years bill.

I'm sure it will be completely fair and based wholy on facts.

I highly doubt there is much creative talent in the senate. A few may manage large, well rendered phallus', but the majority will probably just produce crude representations. Edit: I take that back, I seem to recall that senator russel is an Iraq veteran, so he is probably well versed in the...

Ok. So to sum up, sb1733 currently contains the original language of hb2522 and is to be sent back to the senate, where they will probably videotape themselves burning a copy of it while sneering at and mooning the camera and then they will send that video to the house. Hb2522 is currently...

Information source?

As far as I can tell, there is no mention of the Wilson amendment language in the "amended and engrossed" version of the bill. I think the amendment was proposed but not voted in.

I thought that might be what was going on because the bill seemed to be repeating itself. Ok, disregard my previous few statements about the bill.

Idk. I've seen sausages made and while it wasn't pretty it never was quite this disgusting.

The Wilson ammenent changed language in section 1289.25, but there is no mention of section 1289.25 in the current bill. The bill stops at 1289.24 and then jumps to 1290. So as I understand it the Wilson amendment is NOt in the current bill.

I just checked and Wilson is one of the only two people in the senate still voting against the bill so yeah it was only to drag the bill down.