Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions w/ local, state police

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

_CY_

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
33,848
Reaction score
6,619
Location
tulsa
Holder limits seized-asset sharing process that split billions with local, state police

January 16 at 2:15 PM

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Friday barred local and state police from using federal law to seize cash, cars and other property without warrants or criminal charges.

Holder’s action represents the most sweeping check on police power to confiscate personal property since the seizures began three decades ago as part of the war on drugs.

Since 2008, thousands of local and state police agencies have made more than 55,000 seizures of cash and property worth $3 billion under a civil asset forfeiture program at the Justice Department called Equitable Sharing.

The program has enabled local and state police to make seizures and then have them “adopted” by federal agencies, which share in the proceeds. It allowed police departments and drug task forces to keep up to 80 percent of the proceeds of adopted seizures, with the rest going to federal agencies.

“With this new policy, effective immediately, the Justice Department is taking an important step to prohibit federal agency adoptions of state and local seizures, except for public safety reasons,” Holder said in a statement.

Holder’s decision allows limited exceptions, including illegal firearms, ammunition, explosives and property associated with child pornography, a small fraction of the total. This would eliminate virtually all cash and vehicle seizures made by local and state police from the program.

While police can continue to make seizures under their own state laws, Equitable Sharing was easy to use and required most of the proceeds from the seizures to go to local and state police agencies. Some states have higher standards of proof for forfeitures and some require seized proceeds to go into the general fund.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...7ca058-99d4-11e4-bcfb-059ec7a93ddc_story.html
 

4play

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
2,930
Reaction score
185
Location
norman
Seizing cash and/or assets (civil asset forfeiture) without a search warrant or indictments is a big problem. Then having the money and assets to do with whatever they want and little oversight makes it worse, it should not be a part of a department's budget but they are for many depts.

It now seems ironic though, didn't the DOJ, and DHS pay for training and give out grants for training, equipment etc to basically do stuff like this, watch the highways and such for drugs, terrorists? I am sure a lot of these forfeitures can be directly related to that. It has become big business, billions of dollars worth.
 

_CY_

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
33,848
Reaction score
6,619
Location
tulsa
your property is guilty until you prove it innocent ...

if you are say carrying $17k in cash like example below, to purchase equipment for your BBQ restaurant and it's seized. it may cost that much or more in legal fees to prove it innocent and reclaim your cash back. you don't even have to be charged to forfeit your cash.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest posts

Top Bottom