Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
10/22 Sbr
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NikatKimber" data-source="post: 414046" data-attributes="member: 423"><p>There's not much logic or reason to it, like most gun laws and regulations. That's just the way it is.</p><p></p><p>In my opinion, you lose range and accuracy against the rifle, and much heavier and larger than a pistol; the advantage is exactly the opposite. So in my mind, it's just a big compromise, just somewhere in between a handgun and rifle, but for some reason, the .gov has decided that it is more "dangerous" than either of the others.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NikatKimber, post: 414046, member: 423"] There's not much logic or reason to it, like most gun laws and regulations. That's just the way it is. In my opinion, you lose range and accuracy against the rifle, and much heavier and larger than a pistol; the advantage is exactly the opposite. So in my mind, it's just a big compromise, just somewhere in between a handgun and rifle, but for some reason, the .gov has decided that it is more "dangerous" than either of the others. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
10/22 Sbr
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom