Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
1950 to 2010: Not One Mass Public Shooting Where Citizens Could Be Armed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RugersGR8" data-source="post: 2904829" data-attributes="member: 56"><p>Gun-free zones save lives, Benghazi was caused by a video, Obamacare will save families $2,500 a year, etc. If you believe these lib dem Bravo Sierra claims, then you will also believe that taking away our 2nd Amendment Rights, taking away self defense weapons away from law abiding citizens, etc. will thus make us safer---and you are a lib dem Kool-Aid drinking, low-info, sheeple voting <strong>jackwagon</strong>. <img src="/images/smilies/censored.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored:" title="Censored :censored:" data-shortname=":censored:" /><img src="/images/smilies/pissed.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":pissed:" title="Pissed :pissed:" data-shortname=":pissed:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/07/1950-to-2010-not-one-mass-public-shooting-where-citizens-could-be-armed/" target="_blank">http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/07/1950-to-2010-not-one-mass-public-shooting-where-citizens-could-be-armed/</a></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px">1950 to 2010: Not One Mass Public Shooting Where Citizens Could Be Armed</span></strong></p><p>by AWR Hawkins 7 Sep 2016</p><p></p><p><em><strong>In other words, gun-free zones or gun-restricted zones were the targets of choice.</strong></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RugersGR8, post: 2904829, member: 56"] Gun-free zones save lives, Benghazi was caused by a video, Obamacare will save families $2,500 a year, etc. If you believe these lib dem Bravo Sierra claims, then you will also believe that taking away our 2nd Amendment Rights, taking away self defense weapons away from law abiding citizens, etc. will thus make us safer---and you are a lib dem Kool-Aid drinking, low-info, sheeple voting [B]jackwagon[/B]. :censored::pissed: [URL]http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/07/1950-to-2010-not-one-mass-public-shooting-where-citizens-could-be-armed/[/URL] [B][SIZE=5]1950 to 2010: Not One Mass Public Shooting Where Citizens Could Be Armed[/SIZE][/B] by AWR Hawkins 7 Sep 2016 [I][B]In other words, gun-free zones or gun-restricted zones were the targets of choice.[/B][/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
1950 to 2010: Not One Mass Public Shooting Where Citizens Could Be Armed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom