Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
2 Tulsa Officers shot last night
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dumpstick" data-source="post: 3387882" data-attributes="member: 41653"><p>But I did have reason to believe the cop was at fault. I listened to the news. While the folks on this board were busy talking about how someone had pulled out in front of the cop, I heard the news reports.</p><p> While everyoelse was listening to the copter pilot lying about how he saw the SUV pull out in front of the cop, I knew different..</p><p> Yes, the copter pilot lied. He said something he knew to be untrue. He said he saw it, and he didn't.</p><p> Was the copter pilot a cop?</p><p></p><p></p><p> I love this. This is a tactic well known among the left, and anyone else losing an argument.</p><p></p><p>Instead of refuting what I'm saying, which you can't, you are trying to impeach the source.</p><p></p><p> You are trying to find a reason to not believe what you know to be true.</p><p>" Well, that guy is a jailbird "</p><p> " That guy is a sovereign citizen "</p><p></p><p>It's called an Ad Hominem Attack. You attack the person, not the argument. That's usually done when there is no hope of winning the argument.</p><p></p><p>Remember the argument by Clintonistas against the women accusing him of rape ?</p><p>" ..…. Drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, and see what you find..."</p><p></p><p>Remember the attacks against Obama policies ?</p><p>"You don't like it because he's black. You're a racist."</p><p></p><p>This attack on me is the same thing. You can't refute my arguments,you attack me.</p><p></p><p>You don't even know me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dumpstick, post: 3387882, member: 41653"] But I did have reason to believe the cop was at fault. I listened to the news. While the folks on this board were busy talking about how someone had pulled out in front of the cop, I heard the news reports. While everyoelse was listening to the copter pilot lying about how he saw the SUV pull out in front of the cop, I knew different.. Yes, the copter pilot lied. He said something he knew to be untrue. He said he saw it, and he didn't. Was the copter pilot a cop? I love this. This is a tactic well known among the left, and anyone else losing an argument. Instead of refuting what I'm saying, which you can't, you are trying to impeach the source. You are trying to find a reason to not believe what you know to be true. " Well, that guy is a jailbird " " That guy is a sovereign citizen " It's called an Ad Hominem Attack. You attack the person, not the argument. That's usually done when there is no hope of winning the argument. Remember the argument by Clintonistas against the women accusing him of rape ? " ..…. Drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, and see what you find..." Remember the attacks against Obama policies ? "You don't like it because he's black. You're a racist." This attack on me is the same thing. You can't refute my arguments,you attack me. You don't even know me. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
2 Tulsa Officers shot last night
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom