Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
2012 Proposed Changes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="r00s7a" data-source="post: 1721843" data-attributes="member: 9675"><p>I understand the first one, and I would somewhat agree. But if you have ever tried to prosecute a trespasser, it is actually quite difficult to begin with. A regulation, new or old, is not going to stop a trespasser. The first quote seems to open a hole that would leave them an excuse.</p><p></p><p><em>House Bill 2356 by Rep. Kouplen. Specifying that persons in the sole process of retrieving their domestic livestock or other animals may enter land of another unless forbidden to do so, either orally or in writing, by the owner or lawful occupier thereof, if they notify the county sheriff prior to entry. Bill would be effective Nov. 1, 2012, and bill is now assigned to the House Agriculture, Wildlife and Environment Committee.</em></p><p></p><p>The second one states that they have to notify the co sheriff prior to entry. I have no problem with that. I highly doubt a trespasser is going to notify the sheriff before entry, therefore if he does not, he is still considered trespassing. I've had to recover livestock before and either not know the land owner, or couldn't get a hold of them and went ahead and "trespassed" to get the cattle back. I can't see any land owner <strong>in their right mind</strong> that would have any problem with that. I certainly would not mind someone getting their livestock off of me without permission, as long as they aren't in there cutting fences. That's just the way it works sometimes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="r00s7a, post: 1721843, member: 9675"] I understand the first one, and I would somewhat agree. But if you have ever tried to prosecute a trespasser, it is actually quite difficult to begin with. A regulation, new or old, is not going to stop a trespasser. The first quote seems to open a hole that would leave them an excuse. [I]House Bill 2356 by Rep. Kouplen. Specifying that persons in the sole process of retrieving their domestic livestock or other animals may enter land of another unless forbidden to do so, either orally or in writing, by the owner or lawful occupier thereof, if they notify the county sheriff prior to entry. Bill would be effective Nov. 1, 2012, and bill is now assigned to the House Agriculture, Wildlife and Environment Committee.[/I] The second one states that they have to notify the co sheriff prior to entry. I have no problem with that. I highly doubt a trespasser is going to notify the sheriff before entry, therefore if he does not, he is still considered trespassing. I've had to recover livestock before and either not know the land owner, or couldn't get a hold of them and went ahead and "trespassed" to get the cattle back. I can't see any land owner [B]in their right mind[/B] that would have any problem with that. I certainly would not mind someone getting their livestock off of me without permission, as long as they aren't in there cutting fences. That's just the way it works sometimes. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
2012 Proposed Changes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom