Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
2013 OK House of Representatives firearms bills
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tulsamal" data-source="post: 2074667" data-attributes="member: 571"><p>My personal "wish list" on this sort of thing has to do with modifying the concealed carry law. I guess HB2221 is the closest fit since it is making some changes. I've never understood why the original law specifies that your carry gun has to be ".45 caliber or smaller." I guess some legislator was worried about some person carrying a Desert Eagle .50. One on each side so that they are balanced.</p><p></p><p>In my case, I have a Ruger Alaskan in .480 Ruger that I carry around the ranch all the time. Great gun, does just what I need most of the time. But I have to be careful not to leave the property with it. Either concealed or open. That's just ridiculous. An Alaskan in .480 is no more "deadly" than an Alaskan in .454. But the .454 is legal, the .480 is not. Sure would like to see that sentence stricken from the existing law!</p><p></p><p>Gregg</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tulsamal, post: 2074667, member: 571"] My personal "wish list" on this sort of thing has to do with modifying the concealed carry law. I guess HB2221 is the closest fit since it is making some changes. I've never understood why the original law specifies that your carry gun has to be ".45 caliber or smaller." I guess some legislator was worried about some person carrying a Desert Eagle .50. One on each side so that they are balanced. In my case, I have a Ruger Alaskan in .480 Ruger that I carry around the ranch all the time. Great gun, does just what I need most of the time. But I have to be careful not to leave the property with it. Either concealed or open. That's just ridiculous. An Alaskan in .480 is no more "deadly" than an Alaskan in .454. But the .454 is legal, the .480 is not. Sure would like to see that sentence stricken from the existing law! Gregg [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
2013 OK House of Representatives firearms bills
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom