Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
.223 vs 7.62x39
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KurtM" data-source="post: 843616" data-attributes="member: 6064"><p>I always thought a rifle round fit in a rifle and a "carbine round" fit in a carbine. To call the .223 or a 7.62X39 a "rifle round" is an insult to rifle rounds. (ie, 270, 30-06, 300 mags of any type, 7mm mags, .338 mags of any type, 45-70 45-90, all the way up to 50-140 etc.), but machinegun rounds..well that is something different all together<img src="/images/smilies/new/pms2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":pms2:" title="Pms2 :pms2:" data-shortname=":pms2:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KurtM, post: 843616, member: 6064"] I always thought a rifle round fit in a rifle and a "carbine round" fit in a carbine. To call the .223 or a 7.62X39 a "rifle round" is an insult to rifle rounds. (ie, 270, 30-06, 300 mags of any type, 7mm mags, .338 mags of any type, 45-70 45-90, all the way up to 50-140 etc.), but machinegun rounds..well that is something different all together:pms2: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
.223 vs 7.62x39
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom