Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="coolhandluke" data-source="post: 3220723" data-attributes="member: 13284"><p>Looks like I was wrong in regards to Hudson not paying their bills due to the parts being substandard. KE Arms, who produced the slides and frames for the H9, have not received any payments since July 2018 and are owed nearly seven figures according to a recent post on their FB page. KE apparently did not produce the striker assemblies or the extractors that have been regularly failing.</p><p></p><p>I've handled the H9 that my brother ordered last week, but haven't shot it. The pistol (if reliable), is a steal for $599, but I'd never touch one at full MSRP. The mags look to be a redesigned 75B magazine, but the metal is woefully thin and the walls looks like they will bulge eventually. It appears that the thickness of the magazine walls was sacrificed in order to squeeze 15 rounds in a flush fitting magazine. One should be able to use 75B mags instead as long as new mag catch hole is cut in the proper location. The front sight had to be replaced as the pistol shoots extremely low as many have reported. Accuracy is also well below average. The bore slugs at .357, but I believe that the accuracy issues may be primarily due to how far forward the locking lugs are located on the barrel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="coolhandluke, post: 3220723, member: 13284"] Looks like I was wrong in regards to Hudson not paying their bills due to the parts being substandard. KE Arms, who produced the slides and frames for the H9, have not received any payments since July 2018 and are owed nearly seven figures according to a recent post on their FB page. KE apparently did not produce the striker assemblies or the extractors that have been regularly failing. I've handled the H9 that my brother ordered last week, but haven't shot it. The pistol (if reliable), is a steal for $599, but I'd never touch one at full MSRP. The mags look to be a redesigned 75B magazine, but the metal is woefully thin and the walls looks like they will bulge eventually. It appears that the thickness of the magazine walls was sacrificed in order to squeeze 15 rounds in a flush fitting magazine. One should be able to use 75B mags instead as long as new mag catch hole is cut in the proper location. The front sight had to be replaced as the pistol shoots extremely low as many have reported. Accuracy is also well below average. The bore slugs at .357, but I believe that the accuracy issues may be primarily due to how far forward the locking lugs are located on the barrel. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom