Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
6.8 spc
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pharr Shot" data-source="post: 2708176" data-attributes="member: 32954"><p>I'd personally go with the 6.8SPC, I'm just talking caliber wise, not what's out there for it.</p><p>I'd rather have a larger caliber than a smaller one if I'm having to use it for personal defense.</p><p>Now of course it don't matter if I have a .22LR or a .338 Lapua, it's about shot placement and all that fun stuff.</p><p>But I'd rather have to only use say 2 or 3 rounds instead of 5, 6, or 7.</p><p>Now as far as parts and gear wise, 6.8SPC has more to offer in that department than 6.5 Grendel or 6.5 Creedmore. Now I personally don't know the difference between the 6.5 Grendel and 6.5 Creedmore. I find them to both be almost identical.</p><p>But still they both don't stand up to the ballistics of the 6.8SPC.</p><p>Now as far as price of the calibers I think they're all about the same, I wish that 6.8SPC was more readily available.</p><p>I'm thinking of owning two ARs one day in 6.8SPC, a full-size rifle and then a short stroke piston driven system AR pistol so I can just put a QD mount on the back of it and place a sling on it to put around my neck and shoulder since the ATF ruled that putting the Sig brace up to your shoulder is now a "no no".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pharr Shot, post: 2708176, member: 32954"] I'd personally go with the 6.8SPC, I'm just talking caliber wise, not what's out there for it. I'd rather have a larger caliber than a smaller one if I'm having to use it for personal defense. Now of course it don't matter if I have a .22LR or a .338 Lapua, it's about shot placement and all that fun stuff. But I'd rather have to only use say 2 or 3 rounds instead of 5, 6, or 7. Now as far as parts and gear wise, 6.8SPC has more to offer in that department than 6.5 Grendel or 6.5 Creedmore. Now I personally don't know the difference between the 6.5 Grendel and 6.5 Creedmore. I find them to both be almost identical. But still they both don't stand up to the ballistics of the 6.8SPC. Now as far as price of the calibers I think they're all about the same, I wish that 6.8SPC was more readily available. I'm thinking of owning two ARs one day in 6.8SPC, a full-size rifle and then a short stroke piston driven system AR pistol so I can just put a QD mount on the back of it and place a sling on it to put around my neck and shoulder since the ATF ruled that putting the Sig brace up to your shoulder is now a "no no". [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
6.8 spc
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom