Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
A 1911 question for all the purists...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bambihunter" data-source="post: 3586598" data-attributes="member: 342"><p>I guess cost is subjective, but they aren't expensive guns. The reason I no longer own any is because of the two I had, I couldn't make it through a single magazine on either without it jamming. Even my factory "match" guns that were made with even tighter tolerances could go better than that. Once those were broken in with a couple hundred rounds, those worked flawlessly. The two Kimber's still did not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bambihunter, post: 3586598, member: 342"] I guess cost is subjective, but they aren't expensive guns. The reason I no longer own any is because of the two I had, I couldn't make it through a single magazine on either without it jamming. Even my factory "match" guns that were made with even tighter tolerances could go better than that. Once those were broken in with a couple hundred rounds, those worked flawlessly. The two Kimber's still did not. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
A 1911 question for all the purists...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom