Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Military Surplus
A few rounds thru the SAFN
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Perplexed" data-source="post: 2325900" data-attributes="member: 7157"><p>Thanks for the explanation, MM. It's interesting how a bolt-action rifle can seem to have a bit less perceived recoil than a semi-auto. I saw this not long ago when I let several people shoot a M1 Garand and a M1903A4 back to back, using the same HXP ammo. All of these people agreed the 03A4, despite weighing at least a pound less than the M1 and lacking the cushioning effect of a gas system, seemed to have less recoil. Go figure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Perplexed, post: 2325900, member: 7157"] Thanks for the explanation, MM. It's interesting how a bolt-action rifle can seem to have a bit less perceived recoil than a semi-auto. I saw this not long ago when I let several people shoot a M1 Garand and a M1903A4 back to back, using the same HXP ammo. All of these people agreed the 03A4, despite weighing at least a pound less than the M1 and lacking the cushioning effect of a gas system, seemed to have less recoil. Go figure. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Military Surplus
A few rounds thru the SAFN
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom