Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
A little something I wrote for our local newspapers
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Model 70" data-source="post: 2029652" data-attributes="member: 4583"><p><strong><em>Korean shopkeepers were specifically targeted by black rioters. But the Koreans owned guns and heroically defended their property and lives through force of arms, frequently using AR-15s against heavily-armed looters. So anyone who tells you that private citizens don’t need assault weapons are just plain ignorant. Besides, it is the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs.</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>It was a lesson that should have reverberated nationally, but some commentators labeled the Koreans vigilantes. Just another case of the mainstream media getting it wrong.</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Liberal totalitarians demand increased gun control, if not the outright banning of gun sales to citizens.</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Second Amendment - what’s that?</em></strong></p><p></p><p>Excerpt from the recommended reading in the post. It's the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs!! I like that a LOT.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Model 70, post: 2029652, member: 4583"] [B][I]Korean shopkeepers were specifically targeted by black rioters. But the Koreans owned guns and heroically defended their property and lives through force of arms, frequently using AR-15s against heavily-armed looters. So anyone who tells you that private citizens don’t need assault weapons are just plain ignorant. Besides, it is the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs. It was a lesson that should have reverberated nationally, but some commentators labeled the Koreans vigilantes. Just another case of the mainstream media getting it wrong. Liberal totalitarians demand increased gun control, if not the outright banning of gun sales to citizens. Second Amendment - what’s that?[/I][/B] Excerpt from the recommended reading in the post. It's the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs!! I like that a LOT. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
A little something I wrote for our local newspapers
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom