Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
A Question about transporting ammo and weapon
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman" data-source="post: 3295692" data-attributes="member: 24956"><p>I respectfully disagree. <em>"Notwithstanding the provisions of 1272 or *1289.7 of this title,..."</em> makes 1289.13A supersede 1272 and 1298.7 within its own scope. If this wasn't the case, then the use of "Notwithstanding..." in other sections of Title 21 would negate their intended purpose(e.g. Section 1277, subsection D).</p><p></p><p>Note that I had to edit my first post to reflect the new law. I copied the old version of S1289.13A by mistake. The new one refers to 1298.7 instead of 1289.13(hence the asterisk above). I'm just trying to find other parts that may cause non-permit holders some trouble. This one stood out as a possible oversight.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: I just realized some guys already discussed this topic in the Constitutional Carry Law thread and some reached the same conclusion. I will read through that thread.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman, post: 3295692, member: 24956"] I respectfully disagree. [I]"Notwithstanding the provisions of 1272 or *1289.7 of this title,..."[/I] makes 1289.13A supersede 1272 and 1298.7 within its own scope. If this wasn't the case, then the use of "Notwithstanding..." in other sections of Title 21 would negate their intended purpose(e.g. Section 1277, subsection D). Note that I had to edit my first post to reflect the new law. I copied the old version of S1289.13A by mistake. The new one refers to 1298.7 instead of 1289.13(hence the asterisk above). I'm just trying to find other parts that may cause non-permit holders some trouble. This one stood out as a possible oversight. EDIT: I just realized some guys already discussed this topic in the Constitutional Carry Law thread and some reached the same conclusion. I will read through that thread. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
A Question about transporting ammo and weapon
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom