Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
ACLU suing Trump........
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frederick" data-source="post: 3026938" data-attributes="member: 17825"><p>If a woman gets pregnant in the service, she should be medically discharged in my opinion. If she becomes pregnant while on or just before a deployment, she should receive a general discharge in my opinion. I don't have a problem with women in the military, as long as it doesn't harm effectiveness or increase costs. When it becomes so hard to find good recruits that we need women, then we could lower the requirements.</p><p></p><p>Plessy V. Ferguson is a moot point ever since the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I think the constitution should be read strictly. Also, i've never been opposed to eugenics for the purpose of weeding out genetic defects that can be passed on to offspring.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frederick, post: 3026938, member: 17825"] If a woman gets pregnant in the service, she should be medically discharged in my opinion. If she becomes pregnant while on or just before a deployment, she should receive a general discharge in my opinion. I don't have a problem with women in the military, as long as it doesn't harm effectiveness or increase costs. When it becomes so hard to find good recruits that we need women, then we could lower the requirements. Plessy V. Ferguson is a moot point ever since the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I think the constitution should be read strictly. Also, i've never been opposed to eugenics for the purpose of weeding out genetic defects that can be passed on to offspring. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
ACLU suing Trump........
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom