And you pump your ego up constantly with overpriced toys for 5 year olds LMAO
The irony
What does ones collection have to do with a company politicizing their coffee?
And you pump your ego up constantly with overpriced toys for 5 year olds LMAO
The irony
IDKWhat does ones collection have to do with a company politicizing their coffee?
I know exactly what I read and my comprehension is fine. You've been quoted at least three times and each time you attempt to manipulate the conversation. You didn't say the racist ones are turds, you said "Yes; racist proud boy-ish people are turds, what’s the problem here?". I quoted you twice and @GC7 quoted you once. Your answer to him was: "What does this have to do with what I said about racists?"Does anyone even know what they read anymore??
I said that the racist ones are the turds.
to go along with your comprehension,
If I said “ rotten meat is not good to eat”
Surely, it cant mean that you think I believe all meat is rotten?
and yes, I called you Shirley
I agree. In the 'old' days company marketing would avoid anything political, generally. Now it's the lead. I guess they do generate a lot of talk with it, but also a lot of boycotting.On your side of the aisle or not, I wish companies werent so "in your face" about their politics. I for one am tired of basically EVERYTHING being politicized. It's f'n coffee for Gods sake. COFFEE.
This is the most accurate summary. ^^Just listened, while on the tractor, to the founder of BRCC on the Clay and Buck show, now on radio during Rush Limbaugh's time slot. He explained how he was talking about racist and antisemites and how he has no tolerance for them and does not believe they have a place in conservatism. The New York Times took his quote out of context to make it look like he said all conservatives are bad. So typical of the liberal media. BTW, i have never had their coffee, bit will try it now.
I stopped in to try some, and possibly buy some.Just listened, while on the tractor, to the founder of BRCC on the Clay and Buck show, now on radio during Rush Limbaugh's time slot. He explained how he was talking about racist and antisemites and how he has no tolerance for them and does not believe they have a place in conservatism. The New York Times took his quote out of context to make it look like he said all conservatives are bad. So typical of the liberal media. BTW, i have never had their coffee, bit will try it now.
While it's true that there are plenty of conservative lawmakers that are for veterans' welfare. just now many Democrat lawmakers feel the same (not just giving lip service?) In that respect, I don't have a problem with encouraging such thought in Democrats. Also, how much in donations are we talking about here?Dont care about #1
and #2, there are plenty of conservative lawmakers that are for the welfare of veterans also so thats a moot point.
As far as Im concerned, off with his head
I don't know about you, but I take out of context quotes to push a predetermined narrative as something other than "well written." From my time working in television news, as well as having been an interviewee a few times and knowing what I said vice what was reported, I am always suspicious of what was left out of a story, especially when I know that the outlet/journalist is of the opposite side of the spectrum to me.Actually the New York article was fairly well written. It was the far right conspiracy columns that are being posted here are taking snippets as click bait to stir controversy as usual.
Enter your email address to join: