Imma post the same pic again and see if I can get banned LOLAnd I got that off of Facebook! I once posted a picture of a pig railing Mohammad and nothing. But this? Begs the question, is THIS what liberals think is "sexual activity"?
Imma post the same pic again and see if I can get banned LOLAnd I got that off of Facebook! I once posted a picture of a pig railing Mohammad and nothing. But this? Begs the question, is THIS what liberals think is "sexual activity"?
Imma post the same pic again and see if I can get banned LOL
You do understand how the AI/Algorithms they are using work right? Once a picture is identified it'll be hashed and then FB can scan for that data signature on anyone posting it.Imma post the same pic again and see if I can get banned LOL
There are different types of censorship. The reason for different types of censorship is because there are different REASONS or OBJECTIVES for censoring.
Awwww, thanks sweetie. This has been a week of a lot of progress on the board. Me and hoddy agreed on something, and now you're softer side is coming out to show you care.Lol, go easy on the lad
Bless his heart after all.
Did I say anything about them not seeing it again? No, I didnt. Yes I understand, likely moreso, about algorithms.You do understand how the AI/Algorithms they are using work right? Once a picture is identified it'll be hashed and then FB can scan for that data signature on anyone posting it.
Didn't type it slow enough to get the point, that "yes --- it'll get picked up and you'll get whatever their next punishment level is." When there's algorithmic processing of the images on the platform, it's not very likely it's going to sneak by. I mean, sure you can test it if that's your thing, but there's not really a point. Especially since you're such a top tier expert in algorithms you probably already knew that.Did I say anything about them not seeing it again? No, I didnt. Yes I understand, likely moreso, about algorithms.
I was saying I'm going to test gettinng a ban.
Reading comprehension is parramount. I did type this slow for you.
But twitter has and does go on big isis/isil bans, etc. https://fortune.com/2018/04/05/twitter-terrorist-account-suspensions/
Some of it is our optics are a bit skewed, we ALL (left, right, center, male, female, old, young...) suffer from confirmation bias, anchor bias, truthiness, straw man arguments, ad hominen and multiple other biases and logical fallacies. I try to confront mine, and know I fail at times. I don't expect anyone to agree with my opinions. I change them often based on new information. It's a big reason why I ask for examples all the time. It is so I can try to evaluate them independently and attempt to evaluate my own biases and logical fallacies.
Again, twitter went on a large ban of the left in 2018 during the occupy wall street protests, as I've posted more than once. No one I've followed has ever been banned. So the rest, I have to go research.
It would be nice if people could at least agree on the truth, there is only one, and disagree on our opinions. But, that seems to be more impossible with each passing day.
We werent making any progress. You dont understand sarcasm nor can you comprehend reading.Didn't type it slow enough to get the point, that "yes --- it'll get picked up and you'll get whatever their next punishment level is." When there's algorithmic processing of the images on the platform, it's not very likely it's going to sneak by. I mean, sure you can test it if that's your thing, but there's not really a point. Especially since you're such a top tier expert in algorithms you probably already knew that.
Sheesh, we were making such progress and then you got so quick to respond and drop your "likely moreso" that you missed the point again.
You obviously understand sarcasm much better than I do. "Likely moreso" than anyone here. I bow down to your intellectual prowess. I can't imagine how I could have thought otherwise when I was typing about our progress. You sure read me and my statement better than I ever could have thought.We werent making any progress. You dont understand sarcasm nor can you comprehend reading.
Enter your email address to join: