Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Amazon
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rez Exelon" data-source="post: 3497271" data-attributes="member: 5800"><p>LOL, I don't know there's people on this very board that have said they'd like me buried with fishies. So I doubt that this site is free from people that support their actions. Look at the thread's comparing Ashli Babbitt versus Ahmed Arbury for instance. Everyone here quickly worked to find out his background, previous legal troubles etc. Ashli was, for the part of the thread I followed, always referred to as an Air Force vet. But if dig deeper, she had her own legal troubles that I never saw mentioned here. Point being, that folks weren't treating her the same, possibly due to being in support of her actions. </p><p></p><p>Companies are going to do what companies do --- pivot and keep making money. Twitter made money on Trump for years for instance, then decided to act at the last second. It's like a serial killer accepting Jesus 10 minutes before the gas chamber. All the other companies are doing the same thing --- the brand is toxic, they don't want to be seen associated with it because it might hurt the brand. Like how most companies suddenly care about black people in February, and LGBTQ during pride month, but crap on everyone not making them money 100% of the year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rez Exelon, post: 3497271, member: 5800"] LOL, I don't know there's people on this very board that have said they'd like me buried with fishies. So I doubt that this site is free from people that support their actions. Look at the thread's comparing Ashli Babbitt versus Ahmed Arbury for instance. Everyone here quickly worked to find out his background, previous legal troubles etc. Ashli was, for the part of the thread I followed, always referred to as an Air Force vet. But if dig deeper, she had her own legal troubles that I never saw mentioned here. Point being, that folks weren't treating her the same, possibly due to being in support of her actions. Companies are going to do what companies do --- pivot and keep making money. Twitter made money on Trump for years for instance, then decided to act at the last second. It's like a serial killer accepting Jesus 10 minutes before the gas chamber. All the other companies are doing the same thing --- the brand is toxic, they don't want to be seen associated with it because it might hurt the brand. Like how most companies suddenly care about black people in February, and LGBTQ during pride month, but crap on everyone not making them money 100% of the year. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Amazon
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom