Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
American's Views on Guns & Gun Ownership
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="YukonGlocker" data-source="post: 3002057" data-attributes="member: 425"><p>Yes, I addressed your points from a methodology/psychometrics framing, which are the issues you're attempting to address. If you have rebuttals to those points, I'll certainly continue the discussion about them. Which points were unaddressed? </p><p></p><p></p><p>No, that isn't implicit in my outlook, nor is it implicit in the researchers'. You have failed to provide evidence as such.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That is your opinion, one in which many people disagree with; and this study demonstrates that (along with many other studies).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, your opinion; but one that many disagree with. Their opinions are just legitimate as your's is, and their votes count just as much as your's does. This study was an attempt to get a sense of what those opinions are. If anything, it's information that is valuable to pro-gun efforts because we can better understand those opinions.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You have yet to provide any evidence that this study provides tools for anti- or pro-gun purposes. Both anti- and pro-gun people could incorrectly interpret the data to support their side; but I didn't see the authors of this study do that. I haven't read every word of it yet, so it could be there; but you haven't highlighted anything of that nature yet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="YukonGlocker, post: 3002057, member: 425"] Yes, I addressed your points from a methodology/psychometrics framing, which are the issues you're attempting to address. If you have rebuttals to those points, I'll certainly continue the discussion about them. Which points were unaddressed? No, that isn't implicit in my outlook, nor is it implicit in the researchers'. You have failed to provide evidence as such. That is your opinion, one in which many people disagree with; and this study demonstrates that (along with many other studies). Again, your opinion; but one that many disagree with. Their opinions are just legitimate as your's is, and their votes count just as much as your's does. This study was an attempt to get a sense of what those opinions are. If anything, it's information that is valuable to pro-gun efforts because we can better understand those opinions. You have yet to provide any evidence that this study provides tools for anti- or pro-gun purposes. Both anti- and pro-gun people could incorrectly interpret the data to support their side; but I didn't see the authors of this study do that. I haven't read every word of it yet, so it could be there; but you haven't highlighted anything of that nature yet. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
American's Views on Guns & Gun Ownership
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom