Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Andy Richter, and the extinction of high-cap mags.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrandonMF" data-source="post: 1853026" data-attributes="member: 13086"><p>We want them because they are practical. Would it have been any less horrifying if he had used a sword, .30-30 lever gun or any other number of archaic weaponry? Would a five round magazine make a 5.56 round any less lethal? He asks if the ownership of these mags are worth one life. The answer is yes. Because any other answer is foolish. Would a five round magazine still be able to take one life? Yes. Would a kitchen knife in the hands of a madman be able to take one life? Yes. How much is the ownership of kitchen knives worth? One or two lives?</p><p>A psychopath could use a kitchen knife to murder someone, same as a 100 round drum magazine. So what is the difference between a one hundred round drum magazine and a kitchen knife, if saving just one life is important enough to regulate the ownership of these items?</p><p></p><p>His thought process is born of fear and not logic, and is therefore flawed, and so he is wrong. The true answer is that any one with evil in their hearts who has committed to harming innocents is dangerous, whether it be with something as exotic as a russian assault rifle or as tame as the knife you use everyday to eat with. It is evil we must fear, and not the tools that evil men use for their ends.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrandonMF, post: 1853026, member: 13086"] We want them because they are practical. Would it have been any less horrifying if he had used a sword, .30-30 lever gun or any other number of archaic weaponry? Would a five round magazine make a 5.56 round any less lethal? He asks if the ownership of these mags are worth one life. The answer is yes. Because any other answer is foolish. Would a five round magazine still be able to take one life? Yes. Would a kitchen knife in the hands of a madman be able to take one life? Yes. How much is the ownership of kitchen knives worth? One or two lives? A psychopath could use a kitchen knife to murder someone, same as a 100 round drum magazine. So what is the difference between a one hundred round drum magazine and a kitchen knife, if saving just one life is important enough to regulate the ownership of these items? His thought process is born of fear and not logic, and is therefore flawed, and so he is wrong. The true answer is that any one with evil in their hearts who has committed to harming innocents is dangerous, whether it be with something as exotic as a russian assault rifle or as tame as the knife you use everyday to eat with. It is evil we must fear, and not the tools that evil men use for their ends. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Andy Richter, and the extinction of high-cap mags.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom