Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Another AR pistol question
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobC" data-source="post: 921904" data-attributes="member: 687"><p>Personally, I would not buy any lower with a cheesy logo on the side. </p><p></p><p></p><p>However, I would also never consider building an AR pistol. Worrying about how it was originally papered is totally irrelevant if you paper it yourself as an SBR and then configure it any way you want. I don't see the draw to building it as a pistol first, unless you just have to have a functional weapon while you await the stamp. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Rob</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobC, post: 921904, member: 687"] Personally, I would not buy any lower with a cheesy logo on the side. However, I would also never consider building an AR pistol. Worrying about how it was originally papered is totally irrelevant if you paper it yourself as an SBR and then configure it any way you want. I don't see the draw to building it as a pistol first, unless you just have to have a functional weapon while you await the stamp. Rob [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Another AR pistol question
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom