Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Any Glock People Actually like the Smith and Wesson M&P?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mad Professor" data-source="post: 3353758" data-attributes="member: 5316"><p>There have been a few updates even in the Gen 1s. And like most other guns they are inconsistent. The performance center ones seemed to have a different sear. There was a different slide stop and trigger bar in later years. </p><p>I have three 2.0s. Two compacts and a full size. All were better than the factory Gen 1s, but still inconsistent. The worst compact got a Apex DCAE and it is the best now. But the stock compact is great. The full size is stock with a set of Ameriglos on it. I held my own pretty well against all the Rowland’s, optics, and other modified guns in a Vicker’s class when I had to move to it as a backup because of a front sight issue with my primary. </p><p></p><p>But the inconsistency gun to gun is there regardless of brand. I had three G5 Glock 17s that had entirely different triggers. And they were consecutively numbered. Another pair of CN G17 RTF2s that were different. A pair of CN G4 22Cs same etc. The only two I have that felt the same are my CN G44s. And I’ve seen it in other brands also. </p><p></p><p>I don’t have much experience with the 2.0 shields although I classify my Shield 45 as a 2.0. I only replaced the striker block on it to make me happy with it. My 1.0 Shield has a full Apex with a aluminum trigger and it is great. I have a few GB worked and they are awesome. I carry one off and on and it has seen over 25k rounds in training and competition. My favorite go-to gun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mad Professor, post: 3353758, member: 5316"] There have been a few updates even in the Gen 1s. And like most other guns they are inconsistent. The performance center ones seemed to have a different sear. There was a different slide stop and trigger bar in later years. I have three 2.0s. Two compacts and a full size. All were better than the factory Gen 1s, but still inconsistent. The worst compact got a Apex DCAE and it is the best now. But the stock compact is great. The full size is stock with a set of Ameriglos on it. I held my own pretty well against all the Rowland’s, optics, and other modified guns in a Vicker’s class when I had to move to it as a backup because of a front sight issue with my primary. But the inconsistency gun to gun is there regardless of brand. I had three G5 Glock 17s that had entirely different triggers. And they were consecutively numbered. Another pair of CN G17 RTF2s that were different. A pair of CN G4 22Cs same etc. The only two I have that felt the same are my CN G44s. And I’ve seen it in other brands also. I don’t have much experience with the 2.0 shields although I classify my Shield 45 as a 2.0. I only replaced the striker block on it to make me happy with it. My 1.0 Shield has a full Apex with a aluminum trigger and it is great. I have a few GB worked and they are awesome. I carry one off and on and it has seen over 25k rounds in training and competition. My favorite go-to gun. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Any Glock People Actually like the Smith and Wesson M&P?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom