Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Application Question
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow" data-source="post: 1321685" data-attributes="member: 7123"><p>Yes, you're better off, definitely to -when in doubt, disclosure, disclosure, disclosure. If they claim you left something off, you can be sure they they'll reject the app. If full disclosure is made, they'll investigate and determine whether or not it's a prohibition. I don't know if it is or not. If it is, then I would submit that that's an illegal unconstitutional prohibition, if not a felony, but that's a discussion for another day. I don't think that it's a prohibition - they just want a foothold to know whether to look into you further by catching "red flags" - things like drug offenses are considered red flags by them. If I recall correctly, it means they'll look at it closer, but it's not a basis for rejection (unless they determine and allege that you're a <strong><em>current</em></strong> user, per the 4473 question). They may wait till the last 5 of the 90 days to approve it, but if it's not a felony, I *think* they'll still approve - anyone know for sure if a non-current-drug-user with a past misdemeanor possession conviction is a basis for denial? In any event, it's better to take your chances, and an almost-sure rejection based on failure to disclose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow, post: 1321685, member: 7123"] Yes, you're better off, definitely to -when in doubt, disclosure, disclosure, disclosure. If they claim you left something off, you can be sure they they'll reject the app. If full disclosure is made, they'll investigate and determine whether or not it's a prohibition. I don't know if it is or not. If it is, then I would submit that that's an illegal unconstitutional prohibition, if not a felony, but that's a discussion for another day. I don't think that it's a prohibition - they just want a foothold to know whether to look into you further by catching "red flags" - things like drug offenses are considered red flags by them. If I recall correctly, it means they'll look at it closer, but it's not a basis for rejection (unless they determine and allege that you're a [B][I]current[/I][/B] user, per the 4473 question). They may wait till the last 5 of the 90 days to approve it, but if it's not a felony, I *think* they'll still approve - anyone know for sure if a non-current-drug-user with a past misdemeanor possession conviction is a basis for denial? In any event, it's better to take your chances, and an almost-sure rejection based on failure to disclose. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Application Question
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom