Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
AR open carry at Hafer park in Edmond
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="inactive" data-source="post: 3223820" data-attributes="member: 7488"><p>You can be smug if you want, but I don't have to say so. The State Legislature said so when they passed the law.</p><p></p><p>OK State law is not exactly aligned with the Federal law anyway, as the federal statues (in at least some places in statute) states a pistol is<a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=d81236b8e3a4138ecb971a41fa7769bb&rgn=div5&view=text&node=27:3.0.1.2.3&idno=27#27:3.0.1.2.3.2.1.1" target="_blank"> designed with a short stock and to be fired with one hand</a>; the ATF <a href="https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearms-guides-importation-verification-firearms-gun-control-act-definition-pistol" target="_blank">acknowledges the "one hand" design</a>. The state law in the SDA references one or both hands.</p><p></p><p>That's why the state law goes on to define the word, and not rely on an ambiguous definition to be sourced from some other outside context. It sounds like it's splitting hair, but definitions are important in the interpretation and promulgation of law, which is why they bother providing them when such acts are passed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="inactive, post: 3223820, member: 7488"] You can be smug if you want, but I don't have to say so. The State Legislature said so when they passed the law. OK State law is not exactly aligned with the Federal law anyway, as the federal statues (in at least some places in statute) states a pistol is[URL='https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=d81236b8e3a4138ecb971a41fa7769bb&rgn=div5&view=text&node=27:3.0.1.2.3&idno=27#27:3.0.1.2.3.2.1.1'] designed with a short stock and to be fired with one hand[/URL]; the ATF [URL='https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearms-guides-importation-verification-firearms-gun-control-act-definition-pistol']acknowledges the "one hand" design[/URL]. The state law in the SDA references one or both hands. That's why the state law goes on to define the word, and not rely on an ambiguous definition to be sourced from some other outside context. It sounds like it's splitting hair, but definitions are important in the interpretation and promulgation of law, which is why they bother providing them when such acts are passed. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
AR open carry at Hafer park in Edmond
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom