Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MadDawg" data-source="post: 1182270" data-attributes="member: 11627">bob-we are brothers from diferent mothers! <img src="/images/smilies/image039.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":igetit:" title="Image039&nbsp; &nbsp; :igetit:" data-shortname=":igetit:" />Ridge-while the Constitution is an amazing document, it is vague in a few parts.If the had said Citizen that would have really helped.If they had said People in good standing in Society maybe.But as we all know the way its worded now convicts and the insane would have the right to bear arms.Placing &#039;well regulated&#039; into the COMPLETE right is a stumbling block. Implies some sort of benchmark. I am not happy militia is in there either. The problem is most pro-gun guys only recall the last half and the gun regulators the first half.So while I feel strongly about the right to keep and bear, I think most the voting public feels some restrictions are prudent.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MadDawg, post: 1182270, member: 11627"] bob- we are brothers from diferent mothers! :igetit: Ridge- while the Constitution is an amazing document, it is vague in a few parts. If the had said Citizen that would have really helped. If they had said People in good standing in Society maybe. But as we all know the way its worded now convicts and the insane would have the right to bear arms. Placing 'well regulated' into the COMPLETE right is a stumbling block. Implies some sort of benchmark. I am not happy militia is in there either. The problem is most pro-gun guys only recall the last half and the gun regulators the first half. So while I feel strongly about the right to keep and bear, I think most the voting public feels some restrictions are prudent. [/QUOTE]

Verification