Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Assault Weapons Ban 2019
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="amcardon" data-source="post: 3195235" data-attributes="member: 26766"><p>So, probably just talking out my butt here, but what if we compare marijuana to guns... Federally it's illegal but many states have decriminalized marijuana regardless. Why couldn't OK say they are decriminalizing NFA items and treat it like marijuana? It's illegal to transport marijuana across state lines, but within the states where recreational use has been legalized (decriminalized) you can grow it, possess it, use it, etc... without repercussions from the state. What if OK said any suppressors made in OK can be used in OK? What if OK said any firearms manufactured in OK can be sold in OK without federal involvement? Instead of constantly having to defend our constitutional rights to keep them from being continually marginalized and diminished, how about we expand them (from where they currently stand) instead?</p><p></p><p>I know laws like that will never pass, but I just don't get why so many are eager to accept and embrace these "forward thinking" and "progressive" ideas that to a point expand your rights, but in the same breath want to restrict other rights. The extreme of that being the left saying we need to expand the rights of illegal aliens and that we also need to restrict the rights of citizens - that should be viewed as treason.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="amcardon, post: 3195235, member: 26766"] So, probably just talking out my butt here, but what if we compare marijuana to guns... Federally it's illegal but many states have decriminalized marijuana regardless. Why couldn't OK say they are decriminalizing NFA items and treat it like marijuana? It's illegal to transport marijuana across state lines, but within the states where recreational use has been legalized (decriminalized) you can grow it, possess it, use it, etc... without repercussions from the state. What if OK said any suppressors made in OK can be used in OK? What if OK said any firearms manufactured in OK can be sold in OK without federal involvement? Instead of constantly having to defend our constitutional rights to keep them from being continually marginalized and diminished, how about we expand them (from where they currently stand) instead? I know laws like that will never pass, but I just don't get why so many are eager to accept and embrace these "forward thinking" and "progressive" ideas that to a point expand your rights, but in the same breath want to restrict other rights. The extreme of that being the left saying we need to expand the rights of illegal aliens and that we also need to restrict the rights of citizens - that should be viewed as treason. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Assault Weapons Ban 2019
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom