Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Assault-weapons ban nixed from bill
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HMFIC" data-source="post: 2143077" data-attributes="member: 7539"><p>It's a shame he's not going to run again... I would take great pleasure in voting against him. </p><p></p><p>We all need to call his office in the morning and express our strong views. I will be... guaranteed.</p><p></p><p>Background checks on private transfers amounts to the most restrictive approach they could possibly take right now. It forces EVERYONE to run transfers through a dealer or become a criminal. In some ways, it's the now version of the 1968 gun control act. More chipping away at the stone and setting up a method by which they can (and will in the future) track every single firearm and it's owner. It's just plain wrong and needs to be stopped in it's tracks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HMFIC, post: 2143077, member: 7539"] It's a shame he's not going to run again... I would take great pleasure in voting against him. We all need to call his office in the morning and express our strong views. I will be... guaranteed. Background checks on private transfers amounts to the most restrictive approach they could possibly take right now. It forces EVERYONE to run transfers through a dealer or become a criminal. In some ways, it's the now version of the 1968 gun control act. More chipping away at the stone and setting up a method by which they can (and will in the future) track every single firearm and it's owner. It's just plain wrong and needs to be stopped in it's tracks. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Assault-weapons ban nixed from bill
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom