Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
ATF Hunting Illegal Machine Guns
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ethan N" data-source="post: 3238335" data-attributes="member: 29267"><p>Well, these Glock conversion kits were marketed as parts to convert a Glock into a machine gun, so it would be hard to argue that they’re not designed and intended to be used to convert a weapon into a machine gun. But even if parts were marketed generically without referencing machine guns or full auto, the fact that they can be used to convert a gun into a machine gun is pretty good evidence that that’s what they were designed and intended for.</p><p></p><p>A trigger isn’t a good example. All guns have triggers. Not all guns have auto seers.</p><p></p><p>For reference, the <a href="https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearms-guides-importation-verification-firearms-national-firearms-act-definitions-0" target="_blank">ATF website quotes the definition of “machinegun”</a> from the relevant law.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I’m in favor of repealing the NFA as much or more than the next guy. I’m for mail order suppressed full auto belt feds for everyone. But, unless you’re willing to test the law and lose, I think the best advice is to comply with the intent of the law, which is pretty clear here. I don’t think they’d have any trouble enforcing the law for any part that is, in reality, designed to convert a weapon to full auto.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ethan N, post: 3238335, member: 29267"] Well, these Glock conversion kits were marketed as parts to convert a Glock into a machine gun, so it would be hard to argue that they’re not designed and intended to be used to convert a weapon into a machine gun. But even if parts were marketed generically without referencing machine guns or full auto, the fact that they can be used to convert a gun into a machine gun is pretty good evidence that that’s what they were designed and intended for. A trigger isn’t a good example. All guns have triggers. Not all guns have auto seers. For reference, the [URL='https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearms-guides-importation-verification-firearms-national-firearms-act-definitions-0']ATF website quotes the definition of “machinegun”[/URL] from the relevant law. I’m in favor of repealing the NFA as much or more than the next guy. I’m for mail order suppressed full auto belt feds for everyone. But, unless you’re willing to test the law and lose, I think the best advice is to comply with the intent of the law, which is pretty clear here. I don’t think they’d have any trouble enforcing the law for any part that is, in reality, designed to convert a weapon to full auto. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
ATF Hunting Illegal Machine Guns
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom