ATF proposal to “re-define” what components constitute a firearm

MilitantBEEMER

Sharpshooter
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
1,684
Reaction score
2,428
Location
Tulsa Oklahoma
From what I can tell, proposal is to make any receiver (including Possibly uppers) a firearm.
Lots of ambiguous language.
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/definition-frame-or-receiver

https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/definition-frame-or-receiver/summary


I haven’t finished reading the entire proposal but it looks like it would reclassify new uppers as firearms

Similar discussion here. https://www.okshooters.com/threads/...nts-constitute-a-firearm.313165/#post-3572841

Didn’t see the other discussion thanks

The ATF needs to be told they are not law makers.

They can call 'em "rules" all they want, but if breaking a "rule" sends you to jail, that rule is law.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Fyrtwuck

Sharpshooter
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
9,577
Reaction score
2,501
Location
Blanchard
I read it briefly. My interpretation is that they want any firearm upper and lower that’s made by a non-FFL to be serial numbered and registered by an FFL.
 

OKNewshawk

Sharpshooter
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
2,331
Reaction score
1,431
Location
Tulsa, OK
Once the proposed rule has been published in the Federal Register we have 90 days to comment on them. We did stop their planned pistol brace rule change last fall by flooding them with negative comments. We need to do that again.
 
Top Bottom