ATF Public Comments on Braces/SBRs *ACTION ALERT*

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

SMS

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
15,299
Reaction score
4,218
Location
OKC area
of course, since you said it.

No, because it actually happened. Over 80,000 comments received along with pressure from Congressmen after constituent outcry, and the ATF publicly backed off as a result.

What’s your problem? Can’t stop arguing for 5 minutes to submit a comment to the ATF or write your Reps?

Gonna argue over who did worse damage to the 2nd instead? Great idea.
 
Last edited:

Buddhaman

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jun 1, 2010
Messages
4,358
Reaction score
1,174
Location
Norman
Seems like their ruling has been a long time coming. The braces were supposed to be to help folks who couldn't hold a "pistol". Then they made a statement that "shouldering the brace doesn't make the pistol an SBR". Now they're saying too many people are shouldering the brace and didn't buy it for helping hold the "pistol". If they give folks free SBR stamps then why even use the "pistol brace" after?
 

jfssms

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
5,342
Reaction score
350
Location
okc
I'm not the one who made a blanket statement about machine guns being banned, do your own research maybe before posting???
Okay, Okie Ill say the ban only affects new production items commonly known as machineguns post-May 1986. Trump changed the definition by executive order. If you need more info just ask.
 

jfssms

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
5,342
Reaction score
350
Location
okc
You're working your way up to complete sentences and thoughts. This is progress. You really should let the adults talk here though.
oh wow you are the OSA brain trust so I will stand down. Much like Roy Mecer. How big a boy are you?
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom