Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
ATF reclassifying frames and recievers
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HiredHand" data-source="post: 3582455" data-attributes="member: 2469"><p>This is a direct result of this case. <a href="https://www.gunsamerica.com/digest/judge-disconnect-atf-classification-lower-receivers-firearms/" target="_blank">https://www.gunsamerica.com/digest/judge-disconnect-atf-classification-lower-receivers-firearms/</a></p><p></p><p>“After deliberating for more than a year, US District Court Judge James V. Selna determined that because an AR-15 lower receiver does not house the bolt or breechblock and is not threaded to the barrel, as defined in <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/27/478.11" target="_blank">27 C.F.R. § 478.11</a>, it does not constitute a “receiver” and cannot be considered a “firearm” under <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921#a_3" target="_blank">federal law</a>.</p><p></p><p>“No reasonable person would understand that a part constitutes a receiver where it lacks the components specified in the regulation,” Selna wrote.”</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HiredHand, post: 3582455, member: 2469"] This is a direct result of this case. [URL]https://www.gunsamerica.com/digest/judge-disconnect-atf-classification-lower-receivers-firearms/[/URL] “After deliberating for more than a year, US District Court Judge James V. Selna determined that because an AR-15 lower receiver does not house the bolt or breechblock and is not threaded to the barrel, as defined in [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/27/478.11']27 C.F.R. § 478.11[/URL], it does not constitute a “receiver” and cannot be considered a “firearm” under [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921#a_3']federal law[/URL]. “No reasonable person would understand that a part constitutes a receiver where it lacks the components specified in the regulation,” Selna wrote.” [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
ATF reclassifying frames and recievers
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom