Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
AWB response from Coburn
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dale00" data-source="post: 2056947" data-attributes="member: 688"><p>He is leaving himself wiggle room to please the anti's. Typical politician's letter: "I'm in favor of this but on the other hand I like this and I'm open to reasonable measures" It is written so that we will read and grab onto what sounds good to us while not seeing how he is leaving the door open to losing part of our gun rights. </p><p></p><p>He needs to unequivocally commit to opposing the second amendment from any infringement. In addition one of his talking points should be that <u>the second amendment is what keeps us safe so it is imperative that we reject any and all infringement</u>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As others have pointed out, we need to fight the bit by bit loss of our gun rights. Our liberty depends on this. I sense that Coburn is ready to compromise in order to look good instead of standing behind the second amendment without compromise. Standing behind the second amendment makes you a gun nut in Washington circles. This letter make me aware that Coburn needs to hear from us explicitly - "No infringement <strong>period</strong>, that is the reasonable position not compromise."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dale00, post: 2056947, member: 688"] He is leaving himself wiggle room to please the anti's. Typical politician's letter: "I'm in favor of this but on the other hand I like this and I'm open to reasonable measures" It is written so that we will read and grab onto what sounds good to us while not seeing how he is leaving the door open to losing part of our gun rights. He needs to unequivocally commit to opposing the second amendment from any infringement. In addition one of his talking points should be that [U]the second amendment is what keeps us safe so it is imperative that we reject any and all infringement[/U]. As others have pointed out, we need to fight the bit by bit loss of our gun rights. Our liberty depends on this. I sense that Coburn is ready to compromise in order to look good instead of standing behind the second amendment without compromise. Standing behind the second amendment makes you a gun nut in Washington circles. This letter make me aware that Coburn needs to hear from us explicitly - "No infringement [B]period[/B], that is the reasonable position not compromise." [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
AWB response from Coburn
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom