Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Bad News in the 10th Circuit
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2120139" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>The ruling ignored certain aspects of the case, and pretty much stood on the foundation of In light of our nations extensive practice of restricting citizens freedom to carry firearms in a concealed manner, we hold that this activity does not fall within the scope of the Second Amendments protections. It's also in direct conflict with the 7th Circuit's ruling in Heller v. McDonald. </p><p></p><p>If the courts have already ruled that the 2nd is an individual right, then it's automatically a right reserved to the people, not the states. If the right to "keep AND bear" arms is a right, then the only logical way to say it doesn't cover concealed carry is to admit that it DOES cover open carry. That is unless someone can come up with a way to bear arms that is neither open nor concealed. <img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2120139, member: 1132"] The ruling ignored certain aspects of the case, and pretty much stood on the foundation of In light of our nations extensive practice of restricting citizens freedom to carry firearms in a concealed manner, we hold that this activity does not fall within the scope of the Second Amendments protections. It's also in direct conflict with the 7th Circuit's ruling in Heller v. McDonald. If the courts have already ruled that the 2nd is an individual right, then it's automatically a right reserved to the people, not the states. If the right to "keep AND bear" arms is a right, then the only logical way to say it doesn't cover concealed carry is to admit that it DOES cover open carry. That is unless someone can come up with a way to bear arms that is neither open nor concealed. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Bad News in the 10th Circuit
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom