Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Baltimore Cops Carried Toy Guns to Plant on People They Shot, Trial Reveals
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 3092821" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>Oh, one of many reasons, but yes, a very good one. It's a lot easier to get things suppressed--even things that were planted--if the search wasn't valid in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Of course, if you're dead, "consent" really doesn't matter; your family's best hope is an honest coroner (read: <em>not</em> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Hayne" target="_blank">Dr. Steven Hayne</a>) who can show that the gun in your hand wasn't there when you expired, or a video that shows the cops planting it. But then, given that the cops show no shame in suing on the theory that <a href="https://www.ocregister.com/2017/06/14/court-of-appeal-rules-santa-ana-police-department-violated-state-law-in-internal-investigation-of-officers-in-pot-shop-raid/" target="_blank">their privacy rights were violated when prosecutors used video from the surveillance camera they forgot to disable</a>, maybe even video isn't enough.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 3092821, member: 13624"] Oh, one of many reasons, but yes, a very good one. It's a lot easier to get things suppressed--even things that were planted--if the search wasn't valid in the first place. Of course, if you're dead, "consent" really doesn't matter; your family's best hope is an honest coroner (read: [I]not[/I] [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Hayne']Dr. Steven Hayne[/URL]) who can show that the gun in your hand wasn't there when you expired, or a video that shows the cops planting it. But then, given that the cops show no shame in suing on the theory that [URL='https://www.ocregister.com/2017/06/14/court-of-appeal-rules-santa-ana-police-department-violated-state-law-in-internal-investigation-of-officers-in-pot-shop-raid/']their privacy rights were violated when prosecutors used video from the surveillance camera they forgot to disable[/URL], maybe even video isn't enough. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Baltimore Cops Carried Toy Guns to Plant on People They Shot, Trial Reveals
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom