Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Being a 'Good Samaritan'
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NikatKimber" data-source="post: 3061487" data-attributes="member: 423"><p>The bold red, do you mean the video makes good points?</p><p></p><p>*****</p><p></p><p>They didn't tell us what the actual "training" of the students was. Other than some vague implication that "it is more than half the states require to carry". Which doesn't tell us anything. Some states require no training at all.</p><p></p><p>They set up the audience.</p><p></p><p>They set up the bad guy to succeed. (training and knowledge)</p><p></p><p>They didn't show us all 6 actors. They only showed 3 that failed. How did the other three do? Did they all pass (meaning subdue the attacker) hence being cut due to the "study" being clearly and fundamentally biased?</p><p></p><p>The student was always in the same place. When I was a potential carrier, I never sat front middle.</p><p></p><p>*****</p><p></p><p>I would argue that just like the student's chances of success, there is little to no valid data from this video.</p><p></p><p>Here's the article that went with it in 2009.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=7298996&page=1" target="_blank">http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=7298996&page=1</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NikatKimber, post: 3061487, member: 423"] The bold red, do you mean the video makes good points? ***** They didn't tell us what the actual "training" of the students was. Other than some vague implication that "it is more than half the states require to carry". Which doesn't tell us anything. Some states require no training at all. They set up the audience. They set up the bad guy to succeed. (training and knowledge) They didn't show us all 6 actors. They only showed 3 that failed. How did the other three do? Did they all pass (meaning subdue the attacker) hence being cut due to the "study" being clearly and fundamentally biased? The student was always in the same place. When I was a potential carrier, I never sat front middle. ***** I would argue that just like the student's chances of success, there is little to no valid data from this video. Here's the article that went with it in 2009. [URL]http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=7298996&page=1[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Being a 'Good Samaritan'
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom