Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Beretta M9/92F: OSA's Opinion
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoBoost" data-source="post: 1614318" data-attributes="member: 3455"><p>1) Null hypothesis: now you are just pissing me off! That's the whole point of null hypothesis - it can't be proven. You can only reject it or fail to do so. </p><p>Ho - weight of pistol bullet doesn't affect leathelity</p><p>Mu1 - chuckhawk's study shows no one-shot-stop difference</p><p>Mu2 - Ellifritz's shows no difference in percentage of fatal hits</p><p>Ho: Mu1 = Mu2</p><p>Hypothesis stands.</p><p></p><p>Sorry my science is still good. I give you real numbers - all you give me calling my statements BS and my science junk - and you are trying to back-it up by 4th grade physics formula, that you manage to f-up - hit me with some data, bro!</p><p></p><p>2) FS92 is great pistol - there are some draw-backs <em>in my opinion</em>: </p><p> a) it should have trigger safety, not mechanical; and if mechanical safety is a must - it should be frame mounted.</p><p> b) it should have polymer frame to make it lighter</p><p> c) it should be in "smarter" caliber (see below)</p><p></p><p>3) I don't think that 9mm is the end all, and I am surely not giving up half capacity for marginal caliber increase is worth it (for some reason 45-fan-club takes it very close to heart). Here is my opinion - next generation handguns will be all polymer, recoil-less design that will hold 20-30 rounds in very small caliber (4-6mm) that fires at very high speed - possibly caseless, but most likely just new propellant in a small stiff case (kinds like pissed-off rimless 17HMR).</p><p></p><p>4) There are lot's of "not first choice" votes - what is the first choice then?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoBoost, post: 1614318, member: 3455"] 1) Null hypothesis: now you are just pissing me off! That's the whole point of null hypothesis - it can't be proven. You can only reject it or fail to do so. Ho - weight of pistol bullet doesn't affect leathelity Mu1 - chuckhawk's study shows no one-shot-stop difference Mu2 - Ellifritz's shows no difference in percentage of fatal hits Ho: Mu1 = Mu2 Hypothesis stands. Sorry my science is still good. I give you real numbers - all you give me calling my statements BS and my science junk - and you are trying to back-it up by 4th grade physics formula, that you manage to f-up - hit me with some data, bro! 2) FS92 is great pistol - there are some draw-backs [i]in my opinion[/i]: a) it should have trigger safety, not mechanical; and if mechanical safety is a must - it should be frame mounted. b) it should have polymer frame to make it lighter c) it should be in "smarter" caliber (see below) 3) I don't think that 9mm is the end all, and I am surely not giving up half capacity for marginal caliber increase is worth it (for some reason 45-fan-club takes it very close to heart). Here is my opinion - next generation handguns will be all polymer, recoil-less design that will hold 20-30 rounds in very small caliber (4-6mm) that fires at very high speed - possibly caseless, but most likely just new propellant in a small stiff case (kinds like pissed-off rimless 17HMR). 4) There are lot's of "not first choice" votes - what is the first choice then? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Beretta M9/92F: OSA's Opinion
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom