Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Beretta M9/92F: OSA's Opinion
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 1614376" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>Like I said you're looking at this superficially, here it is in plain english.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/science//item/what_is_a_null_hypothesis" target="_blank">http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/science//item/what_is_a_null_hypothesis</a></p><p></p><p>Hopefully the first paragraph is pretty clear here...</p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis</a></p><p></p><p>Be pissed all you like but you need to get up to speed about what I'm talking about. You're talking that mass has no relevance (variable) in stopping someone. It's YOUR job to prove it's equality among all the weights/masses listed previously. If you can't, just admit it, man up and stop trying preach about science you can't provide the background for. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Duuuuuude.... brosef..... it doesn't like ....get any more complicated like ya know. <img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /> We are only talking about force on human tissue correct? If it gets more complicated then by all means.... post something relevant. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>G17, CZ-75, Hi-power, M&P 9, XD9, P226, P228, H&K P30 I'd pick any one of these over a Beretta but that's just me. Only one I haven't owned at one point including the Beretta is the H&K.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD8, post: 1614376, member: 24"] Like I said you're looking at this superficially, here it is in plain english. [url]http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/science//item/what_is_a_null_hypothesis[/url] Hopefully the first paragraph is pretty clear here... [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis[/url] Be pissed all you like but you need to get up to speed about what I'm talking about. You're talking that mass has no relevance (variable) in stopping someone. It's YOUR job to prove it's equality among all the weights/masses listed previously. If you can't, just admit it, man up and stop trying preach about science you can't provide the background for. Duuuuuude.... brosef..... it doesn't like ....get any more complicated like ya know. :D We are only talking about force on human tissue correct? If it gets more complicated then by all means.... post something relevant. G17, CZ-75, Hi-power, M&P 9, XD9, P226, P228, H&K P30 I'd pick any one of these over a Beretta but that's just me. Only one I haven't owned at one point including the Beretta is the H&K. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Beretta M9/92F: OSA's Opinion
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom