Biden and the 9mm

ricco

Marksman
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Messages
56
Reaction score
61
Location
kansas
If "need" is the bar we set as to whether we possess a thing we will possess little more than food, water and shelter. Everything other than the most basic needs for the preservation of life is a want, not a need. We have to be careful when subjucating others to our ideas of needs as opposed to wants.
 
Last edited:

wawazat

Sharpshooter
Supporter
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
290
Reaction score
419
Location
OKC, OK
If need is the criteria set, then even food will be heavily limited. most of the middle aisles of grocery stores should be banned as well. At least that move would legitimately save more lives in a year than are taken by firearms in a decade. The people I always end up in line behind at the first of the month would be pretty upset when there are no Doritos or cereal to buy with their WIC card though.
 

ConstitutionCowboy

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
5,225
Reaction score
3,114
Location
Kingfisher County
Anyone and/or any group doing or promoting any level of disarmament of any one or all of the people is an enemy of the people. They are guilty of treason be they the tyrants, despots, and/or dictators with designs to subjugate the people or are "unknowingly" aiding and abetting any enemy with an easy conquest. Feigning ignorance is no defense. Recorded history clearly shows what happens when any one or all of the people are unarmed or disarmed. The foregoing is the reason why we have the Second Amendment to prohibit anyone in power to infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

Anyone who has enacted law or failed to repeal law infringing upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms is just as despicable - more so in my view - as anyone who would take advantage of and conquer disarmed people.

If it were in any fashion prudent for the people to be unarmed, the Second Amendment would never have been crafted. People would never need to revolt. Government would never be a danger to people. However, knowing the past, I'll not surrender any arms and march less prepared into the future.

Woody
 

CorpsVet

Sharpshooter
Supporter
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
2,558
Reaction score
1,605
Location
Smallville, OK
Anyone and/or any group doing or promoting any level of disarmament of any one or all of the people is an enemy of the people. They are guilty of treason be they the tyrants, despots, and/or dictators with designs to subjugate the people or are "unknowingly" aiding and abetting any enemy with an easy conquest. Feigning ignorance is no defense. Recorded history clearly shows what happens when any one or all of the people are unarmed or disarmed. The foregoing is the reason why we have the Second Amendment to prohibit anyone in power to infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

Anyone who has enacted law or failed to repeal law infringing upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms is just as despicable - more so in my view - as anyone who would take advantage of and conquer disarmed people.

If it were in any fashion prudent for the people to be unarmed, the Second Amendment would never have been crafted. People would never need to revolt. Government would never be a danger to people. However, knowing the past, I'll not surrender any arms and march less prepared into the future.

Woody
Well said!
 

gerhard1

Sharpshooter
Supporter
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
3,894
Reaction score
2,428
Location
Rural Grant County
What exactly is he saying here? I am not following the point he is making... Can anyone help me out?
During the 2020 ca,mpaign the NRA said that he callled for outlawng 9 mm handguns and amunition for civilian use. They said the NRA was not being truthful and the MSM backed Biden up. If memory serves, WaPo gave the NRA Pinocchio points for the claim.

Now he seems to be confrmiing what the NRA said orginally.
 
Top Bottom