Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Bill calls for abolishment of ATF
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frederick" data-source="post: 2945735" data-attributes="member: 17825"><p>I don't have a problem with new yorkers or californians, i think they're right to run their state how they want to run it. I just think they should run their own state and not ours.</p><p></p><p>I'd say a lot of red states tend to also be more rural states</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, but if 3/5ths of the states are conservative, would it not be in the interests of the State that the representatives of the State represented the majority opinion of that State, not the split nature of the electorate of that state?</p><p></p><p>Why should Oklahoma, for example, have a democrat senator and a Republican senator, when 66% of the state voted for the Republican party the last 30 years? does having a democrat senator represent the interests of the state, just because a minority of the State is not conservative?</p><p></p><p>the Senate should give each state equal representation based on the majority opinion of the State, the interests of the State, otherwise it's just a smaller House.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frederick, post: 2945735, member: 17825"] I don't have a problem with new yorkers or californians, i think they're right to run their state how they want to run it. I just think they should run their own state and not ours. I'd say a lot of red states tend to also be more rural states Yes, but if 3/5ths of the states are conservative, would it not be in the interests of the State that the representatives of the State represented the majority opinion of that State, not the split nature of the electorate of that state? Why should Oklahoma, for example, have a democrat senator and a Republican senator, when 66% of the state voted for the Republican party the last 30 years? does having a democrat senator represent the interests of the state, just because a minority of the State is not conservative? the Senate should give each state equal representation based on the majority opinion of the State, the interests of the State, otherwise it's just a smaller House. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Bill calls for abolishment of ATF
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom