Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Bill to Remove Suppresors From NFA
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zghorner" data-source="post: 2825703" data-attributes="member: 35089"><p>Dear Mr. Horner,</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you for contacting me about the Hearing Protection Act of 2015. I value your opinion and appreciate the time you took to contact me. </p><p> </p><p>As a proud gun owner and founder of a small rifle manufacturing company, I strongly believe that the Second Amendment protects our individual right to keep and bear arms. Gun-related tragedies generate pressure to pass restricting legislation, but they would simply undermine the rights of law-abiding citizens without accomplishing their intended purposes. I will oppose all legislation that unconstitutionally restricts the right to keep and bear arms. </p><p> </p><p>Current regulations require buyers of suppressors to send an application to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), pay a $200 tax, and pass an arduously time consuming ATF background check. </p><p> </p><p>On October 22, 2015, Rep. Matt Salmon (AZ-5) introduced H.R. 3799, the Hearing Protection Act of 2015. If enacted into law, this bill would remove suppressors from regulations established under the National Firearms Act of 1934. There would be no application, no tax, and buyers would be required to pass the same National Criminal Instant Background Check (NICS) as law-abiding guns owners.</p><p></p><p>H.R. 3799 was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means, as well as the Committee on the Judiciary for further consideration. Although I do not serve on these committees, I will keep your thoughts in mind if the issue comes up for a full vote in the House. </p><p>Thank you again for taking the time to share your opinions and concerns with me. Please visit my website to send another message, read my positions on major issues, and sign up for my E-Newsletter. I hope you will also share your experience with my offices and staff here. I look forward to hearing from you again soon. It is an honor to be your voice in Congress.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p> Sincerely, </p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> Steve Russell</p><p> Member of Congress</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zghorner, post: 2825703, member: 35089"] Dear Mr. Horner, Thank you for contacting me about the Hearing Protection Act of 2015. I value your opinion and appreciate the time you took to contact me. As a proud gun owner and founder of a small rifle manufacturing company, I strongly believe that the Second Amendment protects our individual right to keep and bear arms. Gun-related tragedies generate pressure to pass restricting legislation, but they would simply undermine the rights of law-abiding citizens without accomplishing their intended purposes. I will oppose all legislation that unconstitutionally restricts the right to keep and bear arms. Current regulations require buyers of suppressors to send an application to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), pay a $200 tax, and pass an arduously time consuming ATF background check. On October 22, 2015, Rep. Matt Salmon (AZ-5) introduced H.R. 3799, the Hearing Protection Act of 2015. If enacted into law, this bill would remove suppressors from regulations established under the National Firearms Act of 1934. There would be no application, no tax, and buyers would be required to pass the same National Criminal Instant Background Check (NICS) as law-abiding guns owners. H.R. 3799 was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means, as well as the Committee on the Judiciary for further consideration. Although I do not serve on these committees, I will keep your thoughts in mind if the issue comes up for a full vote in the House. Thank you again for taking the time to share your opinions and concerns with me. Please visit my website to send another message, read my positions on major issues, and sign up for my E-Newsletter. I hope you will also share your experience with my offices and staff here. I look forward to hearing from you again soon. It is an honor to be your voice in Congress. Sincerely, Steve Russell Member of Congress [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Bill to Remove Suppresors From NFA
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom