Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
BREAKING: ATF says most popular pistol braces "shouldering devices"
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3472447" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Shouldering device? What's up with that?!?</p><p></p><p>My arms do all the shouldering I require. A pistol grip is not a shouldering device. A rifle stock is not a shouldering device.</p><p></p><p>I got out the most intelligent rifle and pistol I own, laid them on the table, and ordered them to shoulder. Neither one moved. Neither one even grunted in an attempt. They just laid there, dumb as a rock, totally immobile. Hell, these things can't even fire on their own! Not even aim themselves!</p><p></p><p>Sheesh. How are we supposed to abide some illegitimate(to say the least) edict from unelected illiterates? People who can't even compose a cogent thought into words the rest of the world understands? There should be at least one linguist in these agencies(even though they are unconstitutional).</p><p></p><p>Suppose I make a rifle with a stock that rests upon my shoulder instead of up against the front of it. Is it still a rifle? Couldn't I call it a pistol since it doesn't seat up against my shoulder and requires it to be totally controlled with one or two hands? I'd call it a brace, or balance beam, or a recoil absorber. I could fill it full of ammo and call it a magazine!</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3472447, member: 745"] Shouldering device? What's up with that?!? My arms do all the shouldering I require. A pistol grip is not a shouldering device. A rifle stock is not a shouldering device. I got out the most intelligent rifle and pistol I own, laid them on the table, and ordered them to shoulder. Neither one moved. Neither one even grunted in an attempt. They just laid there, dumb as a rock, totally immobile. Hell, these things can't even fire on their own! Not even aim themselves! Sheesh. How are we supposed to abide some illegitimate(to say the least) edict from unelected illiterates? People who can't even compose a cogent thought into words the rest of the world understands? There should be at least one linguist in these agencies(even though they are unconstitutional). Suppose I make a rifle with a stock that rests upon my shoulder instead of up against the front of it. Is it still a rifle? Couldn't I call it a pistol since it doesn't seat up against my shoulder and requires it to be totally controlled with one or two hands? I'd call it a brace, or balance beam, or a recoil absorber. I could fill it full of ammo and call it a magazine! Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
BREAKING: ATF says most popular pistol braces "shouldering devices"
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom