Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
BREAKING: BOEING 737 ENGINE COWLING COMES APART in FLIGHT
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rez Exelon" data-source="post: 4245891" data-attributes="member: 5800"><p>I mean, if it was carriers cutting corners, then why are we not seeing issues with Airbus? Carriers are only cutting corners with Boeing? Does that make sense? </p><p></p><p>I mean sure, I bet the carriers cutting corners are the reason that the Max planes went down. The carriers definitely designed the MCAS system and decided that they'd make it reliant on a single point of failure and then tell themselves that no additional training was required.</p><p></p><p>The carriers 100% decided that shoddy procedures and oversight of the airframes was totally cool before the door plug blew out. I mean, they probably wanted the bad press with their company name on it.</p><p></p><p>And who can deny that the carriers were the ones that somehow got designated by the FAA to inspect themselves at the Boeing factory and pass things that shouldn't have. It was super of Boeing to obvious allow them in to do that as well.</p><p></p><p>The only thing that makes sense in that argument is that "there have been colossal screw ups and bad decisions by management". Boeing used to be a company of engineers --- once they gave that up in favor of chasing pennies of profit for shareholders by turning their backs on their history and what made them who they were ---- THAT'S when the saying changed from "if it isn't Boeing" to "If it IS Boeing I'm not going".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rez Exelon, post: 4245891, member: 5800"] I mean, if it was carriers cutting corners, then why are we not seeing issues with Airbus? Carriers are only cutting corners with Boeing? Does that make sense? I mean sure, I bet the carriers cutting corners are the reason that the Max planes went down. The carriers definitely designed the MCAS system and decided that they'd make it reliant on a single point of failure and then tell themselves that no additional training was required. The carriers 100% decided that shoddy procedures and oversight of the airframes was totally cool before the door plug blew out. I mean, they probably wanted the bad press with their company name on it. And who can deny that the carriers were the ones that somehow got designated by the FAA to inspect themselves at the Boeing factory and pass things that shouldn't have. It was super of Boeing to obvious allow them in to do that as well. The only thing that makes sense in that argument is that "there have been colossal screw ups and bad decisions by management". Boeing used to be a company of engineers --- once they gave that up in favor of chasing pennies of profit for shareholders by turning their backs on their history and what made them who they were ---- THAT'S when the saying changed from "if it isn't Boeing" to "If it IS Boeing I'm not going". [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
BREAKING: BOEING 737 ENGINE COWLING COMES APART in FLIGHT
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom