Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Can a company be "Christian"?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokinfun" data-source="post: 2475202" data-attributes="member: 28113"><p>I do not think it contradicts my previous post, which I know that was the point of your question, HaHa.</p><p>My response was to Lurker66's post about Obamacare being a Right. Obamacare is a statute passed by Congress. I made a rebuttal to lurker, which is limited to his claim, nothing more. </p><p>Your question was not confined to the Constitution, but a broader question about Rights, in general. Again, you were being a smartass, and a little churlish. If you want me to respond to your posts, then don't try to twist my argument, when we both know that is what you are doing. I know you understand how a debate is supposed to work. </p><p>If you have an honest question about my views then ask on real questions and I will give you real answers. If you ask a question about a new topic (which is what you did,) I will answer your question. But, you cannot then try to say I contradicted myself, when you know I did not.</p><p>Otherwise, we can feel free to ignore each other.</p><p>What you just did was, the exact same thing you tried to do with God performing abortions, when a woman miscarries. I refused to respond to that post. You claimed that was not your purpose. I took your word for it as a man. Then you did the exact same thing again, when I had trusted you as a man. Then you came back like a smartass little kid saying "I got you." I had considered not responding to your question at all, but I trusted your honesty. I guess I was wrong about you being trustworthy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokinfun, post: 2475202, member: 28113"] I do not think it contradicts my previous post, which I know that was the point of your question, HaHa. My response was to Lurker66's post about Obamacare being a Right. Obamacare is a statute passed by Congress. I made a rebuttal to lurker, which is limited to his claim, nothing more. Your question was not confined to the Constitution, but a broader question about Rights, in general. Again, you were being a smartass, and a little churlish. If you want me to respond to your posts, then don't try to twist my argument, when we both know that is what you are doing. I know you understand how a debate is supposed to work. If you have an honest question about my views then ask on real questions and I will give you real answers. If you ask a question about a new topic (which is what you did,) I will answer your question. But, you cannot then try to say I contradicted myself, when you know I did not. Otherwise, we can feel free to ignore each other. What you just did was, the exact same thing you tried to do with God performing abortions, when a woman miscarries. I refused to respond to that post. You claimed that was not your purpose. I took your word for it as a man. Then you did the exact same thing again, when I had trusted you as a man. Then you came back like a smartass little kid saying "I got you." I had considered not responding to your question at all, but I trusted your honesty. I guess I was wrong about you being trustworthy. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Can a company be "Christian"?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom