Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Careful what you wish for
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Billybob" data-source="post: 3997558" data-attributes="member: 1294"><p>So even if the kid had been violent before(why was he patted down every day?) he should still be allowed in school? If it's revealed he had assaulted a teacher or brought a gun to school before would you still say the school should have let him attend there and they were not negligent for doing so?</p><p>Given the known pattern of this happening it's just dropping the ball and not negligence?</p><p>How about when a school doesn't report a threat or covers it up is that just dropping the ball?</p><p></p><p>Norman police report...</p><p>"The report goes on to say, “we did not put our eyes on the graffiti and that they were already in the process of getting it cleaned by the time we were notified.”</p><p>This, after Norman Public Schools sent an email to parents saying the police deemed the graffiti a “non-credible threat.”</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.news9.com/story/62b13740038a68072c4bcf40/former-norman-high-teacher-leaves-oklahoma-following-termination-hearing-police-release-findings-" target="_blank">https://www.news9.com/story/62b13740038a68072c4bcf40/former-norman-high-teacher-leaves-oklahoma-following-termination-hearing-police-release-findings-</a></p><p></p><p>In Louden Virginia they denied/covered up for the "troubled" student who sexually assaulted a girl allowed him back in school and he did it again, negligence or just "dropping the ball"?. Since you mentioned schools usurping parental rights let's remember they arrested the dad and the Ed. system characterized him as a domestic terrorist and requested Fed. action against him and other parents who challenged the school board for it's actions.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://wjla.com/features/i-team/loudoun-county-public-school-parents-called-domestic-terrorists-scott-smith-sex-assault-victim-father-wants-apology[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Again I'll ask where's your line for removing problem/dangerous kids from school? When should schools be accountable for ignoring danger to other kids and staff?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Billybob, post: 3997558, member: 1294"] So even if the kid had been violent before(why was he patted down every day?) he should still be allowed in school? If it's revealed he had assaulted a teacher or brought a gun to school before would you still say the school should have let him attend there and they were not negligent for doing so? Given the known pattern of this happening it's just dropping the ball and not negligence? How about when a school doesn't report a threat or covers it up is that just dropping the ball? Norman police report... "The report goes on to say, “we did not put our eyes on the graffiti and that they were already in the process of getting it cleaned by the time we were notified.” This, after Norman Public Schools sent an email to parents saying the police deemed the graffiti a “non-credible threat.” [URL]https://www.news9.com/story/62b13740038a68072c4bcf40/former-norman-high-teacher-leaves-oklahoma-following-termination-hearing-police-release-findings-[/URL] In Louden Virginia they denied/covered up for the "troubled" student who sexually assaulted a girl allowed him back in school and he did it again, negligence or just "dropping the ball"?. Since you mentioned schools usurping parental rights let's remember they arrested the dad and the Ed. system characterized him as a domestic terrorist and requested Fed. action against him and other parents who challenged the school board for it's actions. [URL unfurl="true"]https://wjla.com/features/i-team/loudoun-county-public-school-parents-called-domestic-terrorists-scott-smith-sex-assault-victim-father-wants-apology[/URL] Again I'll ask where's your line for removing problem/dangerous kids from school? When should schools be accountable for ignoring danger to other kids and staff? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Careful what you wish for
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom