Carrying guns inside restaurants that serve alcohol could be next

[CHenry]

If I'm not mistaken, he was carrying a rifle. Carry provisions of the SDA do not cover rifles, only handguns.

He was carrying a rifle AND a pistol.
And yes, OC covers rifles.

 

[CHenry]

But he wasn’t trying to conceal that rifle, tho... Or is this a different incident you’re talking about, because all I can find about an auditor who got into trouble carrying a gun into a twin peaks restaurant was one who ever so foolishly did it with a rifle.

But hey, I don’t expect you to agree with it and I know it’s still against the law regardless but if you properly conceal your.... pistol, nobody will ever know that you have it until that time comes to where you have to use it and then in that case if you do, hopefully things will be on your side; ie, saving the day, preventing a crime- and well if it’s not, how does the saying go?.... I’d rather be judged by 12, than carried out by 6??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He was openly carrying a pistol

 

[bigred1]

Yes, I know. My question was about the “bar area” in a restaurant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you have an SDA license you can go into the bar area but you can't drink alcohol.

 

[CHenry]

If you have an SDA license you can go into the bar area but you can't drink alcohol.

No, you can not.
If your following the law.

 

[bigred1]

No, you can not.
If your following the law.

My mistake. I was under the impression as long as you were not drinking.
EDIT: I see what I wrote now. I meant restaurant area NOT BAR AREA.

 

[bigred1]

@CHenry didn't mean to muddy the waters anymore than they are.

 

[CHenry]

My mistake. I was under the impression as long as you were not drinking.
EDIT: I see what I wrote now. I meant restaurant area NOT BAR AREA.

Easy mistake lol
Although I may of may not carry mine in bar areas...

 

[corneileous]

If you read what I wrote, you'll see I'm comparing a bar and a restaurant. TR is not a bar but they have one.
Reading comprehension.

I did read what what you wrote and again, I’m not talking about that. If you would kindly re-read what I wrote, you’d clearly see that I was talking about if the bar section in a food-serving restaurant was indeed a bar and if it was off limits to guns irregardless of a permit.

Please don’t accuse reading comprehension towards someone unless you have clear proof of failing to do so.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[CHenry]

I did read what what you wrote and again, I’m not talking about that. If you would kindly re-read what I wrote, you’d clearly see that I was talking about if the bar section in a food-serving restaurant was indeed a bar and if it was off limits to guns irregardless of a permit.

Please don’t accuse reading comprehension towards someone unless you have clear proof of failing to do so.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And I answered that question precisely and clearly. Its clear to my reading comprehension 5th grade level.

 

[corneileous]

I said

The article says

How is what I said wrong?

Not saying you’re wrong, it’s just that it could be questionable about a bonafide area of a restaurant that is or is considered to be the bar area.

But yes, whether or not it matters about the bar area in a restaurant, the rest of the dining room, this will level be field and hopefully someday allow the non-permit holders to carry armed in a food-serving restaurant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk