Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
CATO Institute article supports modified Manchin-Toomey - worth reading
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2183189" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>Expanding background checks would make sense ONLY if one actually thought the lefties or anyone else seriously believed it would reduce crime. </p><p>If the Feds were <strong>actually serious</strong> about background checks and NICs' effectiveness, they would have pursued people after they were denied NICs checks, since it is a FELONY to lie on the 4473 form. <strong>Why are the people who lie on the 4473 form almost never prosecuted?</strong></p><p><em>Check this article out:</em></p><p><a href="http://www.newsmax.com/JohnLott/bradylaw-gunownership/2011/06/14/id/399967" target="_blank">http://www.newsmax.com/JohnLott/bradylaw-gunownership/2011/06/14/id/399967</a></p><p></p><p>Hence I believe ALL 2A supporters should be against any kind of expanded background checks...they do nothing and are <strong>only being used by the Left as a pathway to firearm registration. </strong></p><p><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2183189, member: 3553"] Expanding background checks would make sense ONLY if one actually thought the lefties or anyone else seriously believed it would reduce crime. If the Feds were [B]actually serious[/B] about background checks and NICs' effectiveness, they would have pursued people after they were denied NICs checks, since it is a FELONY to lie on the 4473 form. [B]Why are the people who lie on the 4473 form almost never prosecuted?[/B] [I]Check this article out:[/I] [url]http://www.newsmax.com/JohnLott/bradylaw-gunownership/2011/06/14/id/399967[/url] Hence I believe ALL 2A supporters should be against any kind of expanded background checks...they do nothing and are [B]only being used by the Left as a pathway to firearm registration. [/B] :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
CATO Institute article supports modified Manchin-Toomey - worth reading
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom