Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
CC workplace legal question
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shooter00" data-source="post: 885889" data-attributes="member: 4910"><p>I believe that the difference would lie in the terms "prohibited" and "unlawful" as stated in the SDA. You would be prosecuted if you are caught carrying in a place where it is "prohibited by law," because you've broken a law put in place by legislation.</p><p></p><p>Unlawful carry could be seen as a civil matter, like trespassing. If you are on someone's property, they would have to notify you that there is no trespassing (posting or verbally). If you disregard the notification, they can press charges. With a CCW, if it's posted on a building, you are notified. Whether or not they enforce the post would be the key, I would assume.</p><p></p><p>This might be up for debate, it was explained to me by a SDA instructor who took the question to a CLEET attorney. It's second hand info...</p><p></p><p>This is what gets me - if your weapon is concealed, who would know? And if a day came where you needed to skin it and perhaps save a life (your own) are they really going to go there? It would only be a misdemeanor with a $250 fine (TITLE 21 § 1277, para. c) Small peanuts for living! <img src="/images/smilies/faint.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":faint:" title="Faint :faint:" data-shortname=":faint:" /></p><p></p><p>Let me know if I'm not tracking guys...Not trying to sound like the a guru...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shooter00, post: 885889, member: 4910"] I believe that the difference would lie in the terms "prohibited" and "unlawful" as stated in the SDA. You would be prosecuted if you are caught carrying in a place where it is "prohibited by law," because you've broken a law put in place by legislation. Unlawful carry could be seen as a civil matter, like trespassing. If you are on someone's property, they would have to notify you that there is no trespassing (posting or verbally). If you disregard the notification, they can press charges. With a CCW, if it's posted on a building, you are notified. Whether or not they enforce the post would be the key, I would assume. This might be up for debate, it was explained to me by a SDA instructor who took the question to a CLEET attorney. It's second hand info... This is what gets me - if your weapon is concealed, who would know? And if a day came where you needed to skin it and perhaps save a life (your own) are they really going to go there? It would only be a misdemeanor with a $250 fine (TITLE 21 § 1277, para. c) Small peanuts for living! :faint: Let me know if I'm not tracking guys...Not trying to sound like the a guru... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
CC workplace legal question
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom