Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
CCW and suppressor question
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhiteyMacD" data-source="post: 1176007" data-attributes="member: 7633"><p>Go take a legal or ethics class. I had 3 years of them for my 2nd minor. Lack of does not equate to permission. It is considered undefined. All that needs to be done, to nail you for it, is for them to start interpreting. They dont have to go back and rewrite T21 to include verbiage that a suppressor is a type of handgun. All they have to do is show that based on the fact you have an ATF stamp you are aware of the definitions. Since the SoOK does not include suppressors in their definitions, they can claim they default to federal definitions. BAM. You are carrying illegally.</p><p></p><p>And countering by saying my argument is based on conjecture and therefore invalid is argumentum ad ignorantiam.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhiteyMacD, post: 1176007, member: 7633"] Go take a legal or ethics class. I had 3 years of them for my 2nd minor. Lack of does not equate to permission. It is considered undefined. All that needs to be done, to nail you for it, is for them to start interpreting. They dont have to go back and rewrite T21 to include verbiage that a suppressor is a type of handgun. All they have to do is show that based on the fact you have an ATF stamp you are aware of the definitions. Since the SoOK does not include suppressors in their definitions, they can claim they default to federal definitions. BAM. You are carrying illegally. And countering by saying my argument is based on conjecture and therefore invalid is argumentum ad ignorantiam. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
CCW and suppressor question
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom