Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Climate Change According to the Co-Founder of Greenpeace
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Capm_Spaulding" data-source="post: 2859043" data-attributes="member: 17977"><p>These aren't just random numbers for me, they are my peers and those I studied with and under. I've never met a colleague that's been one of the conspirator types, it's hard to illustrate this, but these people are typically scene in the same light an MD sees homeopathic "physicians." There are plenty out there any plenty who believe them. Their science makes sense, but it's a half painted picture.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you were to have clicked and navigated through that site, they have gathered their information from journals and other educational sources that is cited at the bottom of every page. </p><p>It's really a waste of my time if you aren't interested in learning objectively. We can debate rhetoric and politics all day, but I have no interest in that. I was asked specific questions about a field I've dedicated years of my life to and gave you my professional opinion along with pages that echo what I've said. You can look objectively and get to the bottom of it to form your own opinions or you can do what you're doing it. It's all up to you, I've given you some tools as you asked for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Capm_Spaulding, post: 2859043, member: 17977"] These aren't just random numbers for me, they are my peers and those I studied with and under. I've never met a colleague that's been one of the conspirator types, it's hard to illustrate this, but these people are typically scene in the same light an MD sees homeopathic "physicians." There are plenty out there any plenty who believe them. Their science makes sense, but it's a half painted picture. If you were to have clicked and navigated through that site, they have gathered their information from journals and other educational sources that is cited at the bottom of every page. It's really a waste of my time if you aren't interested in learning objectively. We can debate rhetoric and politics all day, but I have no interest in that. I was asked specific questions about a field I've dedicated years of my life to and gave you my professional opinion along with pages that echo what I've said. You can look objectively and get to the bottom of it to form your own opinions or you can do what you're doing it. It's all up to you, I've given you some tools as you asked for. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Climate Change According to the Co-Founder of Greenpeace
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom