Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Clinton public corruption
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John6185" data-source="post: 2846794" data-attributes="member: 25679"><p>People are still supporting the old bag and I don't understand why. She failed the nation and others when she sent Secret and higher messages on her private server and some people think it's ok. Well, it's not! </p><p>She placed the lives of others in jeopardy and seemed to be more interested in getting contributions for the Clinton Foundation than doing her job in a highly sensitive position.</p><p>It's funny, Obama replied to her messages that she sent on her personal server, Kerry as SOS sent classified info on his personal email account also. If they do this right, a lot of people are going to be caged including Clinton's subordinates who didn't rat out on her for sending classified information on her personal email. They covered for her-but that's a little understandable with what little I know about the old shrew's anger threshold.</p><p>Even a military slick-sleeve after receiving a briefing about what would happen to him/her if they sent classified info on their private server would know better than Hillary. Of course the slick-sleeve would have a supervisor which in Hillary's case would be Obama.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John6185, post: 2846794, member: 25679"] People are still supporting the old bag and I don't understand why. She failed the nation and others when she sent Secret and higher messages on her private server and some people think it's ok. Well, it's not! She placed the lives of others in jeopardy and seemed to be more interested in getting contributions for the Clinton Foundation than doing her job in a highly sensitive position. It's funny, Obama replied to her messages that she sent on her personal server, Kerry as SOS sent classified info on his personal email account also. If they do this right, a lot of people are going to be caged including Clinton's subordinates who didn't rat out on her for sending classified information on her personal email. They covered for her-but that's a little understandable with what little I know about the old shrew's anger threshold. Even a military slick-sleeve after receiving a briefing about what would happen to him/her if they sent classified info on their private server would know better than Hillary. Of course the slick-sleeve would have a supervisor which in Hillary's case would be Obama. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Clinton public corruption
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom